Methods

What each BibCrit tool's results rest on: what code computes from the corpus, what text the model is given, and what comes from the model alone.

Three kinds of evidence

Corpus-computed
Code reads or counts it from the corpus. The model plays no part, and the result is repeatable.
Hybrid
The model works from corpus text it is given, and code may check or compute part of the result. Interpretation still comes from the model.
Model knowledge
The substance comes from what the model recalls from training. BibCrit holds no source to check it against. Treat every specific claim as unverified.

No tool below is corpus-computed from end to end. The corpus-computed parts are in the second column. The label on each tool describes its overall result.

Tool by tool

Tool Computed or checked by code Corpus text given to the model From the model Reviewed Prompt and model
MT/LXX Divergence Analyzer
Hybrid
Nothing. The output is not checked. MT, LXX, and any scroll text in the corpus. Classification of each divergence, hypotheses, citations and confidence. Revised divergence v3
claude-opus-4-7
Back-Translation Workbench
Hybrid
Compares each suggested Hebrew word with the MT and the scrolls in the corpus, and corrects false claims of agreement. Shows the status the model first gave. MT, LXX, and any scroll text in the corpus. The suggested Hebrew, its basis and reasoning. Scrolls outside the corpus, marked as such. Revised backtranslation v2
claude-opus-4-7
Ancient Witness Bridge
Hybrid
Works out each witness's label and variant counts from the model's per-variant data, and marks which scrolls are in the corpus. Does not check that data against the texts. MT, LXX, Dead Sea Scrolls, Samaritan Pentateuch, Peshitta and Vulgate, where the corpus has them. Each variant, its type, whether it is substantive and which traditions share it. Two self-reported confidences, the argument and the assessment. Revised dss v14
claude-opus-4-7
Scribal Tendency Profiler
Hybrid
Per book: verse-length correlation, Greek words per Hebrew segment and share of καί. Rough measures of unaligned text. Sample MT and LXX passages, and the computed measures. Evidence labels (clear, debated, none found), notes on examples, and named scholars. Revised scribal v2
claude-opus-4-7
Numerical Discrepancy Modeler
Hybrid
Every number: reads the figures from the MT, LXX and SP, then computes the differences and repeated offsets. One text per tradition; numbers under 10 are left out. The computed table, not the passage. Competing explanations, unranked. Revised numerical v4
claude-opus-4-7
Theological Revision Detector
Model knowledge
Nothing. The output is not checked. For a passage: MT, LXX, Targum, Peshitta, Samaritan Pentateuch and Vulgate, where the corpus has them. For a whole book: none. Whether motive explains a difference better than technique, source or copying, and citations and confidence. For a whole book, every reading is from memory. Revised theological v3
claude-opus-4-7
Patristic Citation Tracker
Model knowledge
Counts the citations listed and their text forms. Does not verify them. MT and LXX, or the SBLGNT for New Testament passages, as reference. Every Father, work, location, paraphrase and text form. BibCrit has no patristic corpus. Revised patristic v4
claude-opus-4-7
Manuscript Transmission
Hybrid
Draws a hand-curated diagram with a published source for each edge, lists the scrolls in the corpus, and rejects invalid edges the model proposes. The model cannot change the diagram. The diagram, the scroll list and the first verse of the Vulgate. Commentary, key divergences and any proposed edges. Revised genealogy v4
claude-opus-4-7
Chiasm Detector
Hybrid
Counts the content lemmas each paired unit shares and ranks the pairing against every other pairing of the same units. Tests repeated words only, not themes. MT. Whether there is a structure, the units, the centre, the evidence and named scholars. Revised chiasm v2
claude-opus-4-7
Pentateuchal Source and Redaction Analysis
Hybrid
Nothing. The output is not checked. MT. Observations, and separate readings under the documentary, supplementary and compositional frameworks. Revised source v2
claude-opus-4-7
Targum Comparator
Hybrid
Refuses a passage with no Targum text in the corpus, without calling the model. Otherwise checks nothing. MT, LXX and the Targum (Torah and Prophets). Comparison, categories of change and confidence. Revised targum v2
claude-opus-4-7
NT Textual Tradition Analyzer
Model knowledge
Nothing. The output is not checked. SBLGNT only. No apparatus, ECM data or manuscript transcriptions. All manuscript evidence and the judgement of how settled the text is. Revised nt_text v3
claude-opus-4-7
NT Use of OT Analyzer
Hybrid
Looks up the MT and Rahlfs text of each passage the model names and shows that text. Does not check the alignment. The New Testament passage, then the MT and LXX of the passages named in a first call. Which Old Testament texts are used, alignment and confidence. Greek revisions are from memory. Revised nt_ot v2
claude-opus-4-7
Second Temple Literature Bridge
Model knowledge
Counts the allusions listed per work. Does not verify them. MT and LXX. No Second Temple texts. Every allusion and everything said about the Second Temple works, with confidence. Revised stl v2
claude-opus-4-7
LXX Manuscript Witnesses
Model knowledge
Works out which codices survive at the passage, overrides the model on this, and flags readings given for a lost codex. Rahlfs' edition only. No text of Vaticanus, Sinaiticus or Alexandrinus. Every reading of the three codices, from memory, and confidence. Revised lxx_ms_variants v2
claude-opus-4-7

“Reviewed” refers to a review of each prompt against these evidence rules, prompted by peer-review criticism of the tool. “Revised” does not mean the output is correct, or that a specialist has validated it.

How to read a result

  • Confidence figures are the model's own estimates, not calibrated probabilities. They are not evidence.
  • Each result shows the model, prompt version and date that produced it. Results are stored, so the same question returns the same stored answer until the prompt changes.
  • Scholars, manuscripts and page references named by the model are not checked against the works. Verify them before citing.
  • Results are generated automatically. No scholar reviews them before they appear.

Corpus texts

MT ETCBC / BHSA
LXX Rahlfs 1935 (eliranwong)
DSS ETCBC / DSS
SP dt-ucph / sp
GNT SBLGNT via MorphGNT
PESH ETCBC / peshitta
TARG Sefaria (Onkelos, Jonathan)
VUL Clementine Vulgate (scrollmapper)

Known limits

  • Each tradition is one text, so variants within a tradition are not in the corpus. Rahlfs' edition, for example, is not the Greek manuscripts.
  • Rahlfs' lettered verses, such as 1 Kings 12:24a-z and the additions to Esther, are separate verses. Ask for them by label (1 Kings 12:24a). They have no Hebrew verse to pair with, and Esther 1:1 is found at Esther 1:1s. Daniel is Theodotion's text. Susanna and Bel are not in the corpus.
  • The Vulgate here is the Clementine edition of 1592, not a 4th-century text. Its Psalms are renumbered to the Hebrew; other books keep its own numbering, which differs in places (e.g. Joel, Malachi, Esther, Daniel).
  • The corpus holds only some Dead Sea Scrolls. A scroll missing from the corpus does not mean no scroll has the reading. Correction: until November 2026 the text labelled 1QIsaᵃ here was 1QIsaᵇ. Results from before then that cite 1QIsaᵃ should not be relied on.

BibCrit runs on your support

This month's analysis budget has been reached. BibCrit is fully open access — all tools remain available. If this research has been useful to you, a small donation keeps the service running for everyone.

Donate